RE: I am a theist, what do you think of my proof for God existing?
November 4, 2016 at 9:50 pm
(This post was last modified: November 4, 2016 at 11:29 pm by Primordial Bisque.)
(November 4, 2016 at 6:59 pm)Mariosep Wrote: If is not at all reasonable and much less intelligent to be debating on something, over which there is no concurred on information on the concept or definition of the object being debated on, in regard to its existence outside of our mind in objective reality of existence.
On my step 1, formulation of the concept of God, Simon asserts that I am already affirming the consequent, that is patently wrong from his part.
No, it isn't wrong. You are affirming the consequent. Your first premise is the same as your conclusion. Including the word 'exists' in the conclusion does not make any difference. You are going off an assumption that your god already exists just by stating it's function. It's not that difficult to understand.
But it doesn't matter because you keep using the word 'concept'. You already know the truth: that there are no physical properties. Your concept of god lacks the necessary attributes, and is meaningless. You've lost. You've been losing since your first post.
“Life is like a grapefruit. Well, it's sort of orangey-yellow and dimpled on the outside, wet and squidgy in the middle. It's got pips inside, too. Oh, and some people have half a one for breakfast.” - Ford Prefect
