|
I am a theist, what do you think of my proof for God existing?
|
 (November 4, 2016 at 6:59 pm)Mariosep Wrote: The right thing if he be into truths, facts, logic, and the history of ideas, is to from his part propose his information on the concept of God, and then we will work together as to in effect join up on the issue. My concept of god is that he is merely a figment of the human imagination, on par with other fanciful non-entities such as Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny. Shall we work from there?  RE: I am a theist, what do you think of my proof for God existing?
November 4, 2016 at 9:50 pm
(This post was last modified: November 4, 2016 at 11:29 pm by Primordial Bisque.)
(November 4, 2016 at 6:59 pm)Mariosep Wrote: If is not at all reasonable and much less intelligent to be debating on something, over which there is no concurred on information on the concept or definition of the object being debated on, in regard to its existence outside of our mind in objective reality of existence. No, it isn't wrong. You are affirming the consequent. Your first premise is the same as your conclusion. Including the word 'exists' in the conclusion does not make any difference. You are going off an assumption that your god already exists just by stating it's function. It's not that difficult to understand. But it doesn't matter because you keep using the word 'concept'. You already know the truth: that there are no physical properties. Your concept of god lacks the necessary attributes, and is meaningless. You've lost. You've been losing since your first post.
“Life is like a grapefruit. Well, it's sort of orangey-yellow and dimpled on the outside, wet and squidgy in the middle. It's got pips inside, too. Oh, and some people have half a one for breakfast.” - Ford Prefect
 RE: I am a theist, what do you think of my proof for God existing?
November 5, 2016 at 2:50 am
(This post was last modified: November 5, 2016 at 2:52 am by Astreja.)
(November 4, 2016 at 9:18 pm)Rosie_Rivets Wrote: My concept of god is that he is merely a figment of the human imagination, on par with other fanciful non-entities such as Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny. Sounds good to Me. Okay, Mariosep, we're going to go with the Rosie_Rivets god-concept instead of yours, as we seem to have consensus here for the "gods are imaginary" hypothesis, and no consensus for your hypothesis. 
Pat Mustard
God! Theresa, I forgot me fecking trousers!  Religious Views: the Disc's first ligthning proof atheist (November 3, 2016 at 12:10 pm)Whateverist Wrote: I wouldn't even give this one a learner's permit toward becoming an atheist. We have standards. Let's not be too hasty here, mario might have access to lots of babies. My supplies are rapidly diminishing.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home
Pat Mustard
God! Theresa, I forgot me fecking trousers! Religious Views: the Disc's first ligthning proof atheist (November 4, 2016 at 3:36 am)operator Wrote:(November 4, 2016 at 2:17 am)Huggy74 Wrote: To put it simply, no one. Huggy's an idiot. Better not to follow him down the rabbit hole.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home
Pat Mustard
God! Theresa, I forgot me fecking trousers! Religious Views: the Disc's first ligthning proof atheist (November 4, 2016 at 5:10 pm)Mariosep Wrote: Dear atheist colleagues here, thanks for your presence and contribution to my thread. Ni!
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home 
Mario, please stop with this convoluted nonsense. Simply SAY WHAT YOU MEAN and quit arguing semantics. You want everyone to get lost in your world of language and quite honestly no one here is buying into it. So say what you mean or go away.
“Love is the only bow on Life’s dark cloud. It is the morning and the evening star. It shines upon the babe, and sheds its radiance on the quiet tomb. It is the mother of art, inspirer of poet, patriot and philosopher.
It is the air and light of every heart – builder of every home, kindler of every fire on every hearth. It was the first to dream of immortality. It fills the world with melody – for music is the voice of love. Love is the magician, the enchanter, that changes worthless things to Joy, and makes royal kings and queens of common clay. It is the perfume of that wondrous flower, the heart, and without that sacred passion, that divine swoon, we are less than beasts; but with it, earth is heaven, and we are gods.” - Robert. G. Ingersoll   (November 5, 2016 at 2:50 am)Astreja Wrote:(November 4, 2016 at 9:18 pm)Rosie_Rivets Wrote: My concept of god is that he is merely a figment of the human imagination, on par with other fanciful non-entities such as Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny. Hey, this was my concept in post #164/page 17. I want some cred or I may threaten to rage quit! Um, this thread only. In concept only with history of ideas. Actually I been trying to quit for awhile but keep experiencing the godfather effect.
Being told you're delusional does not necessarily mean you're mental.
(November 5, 2016 at 4:34 pm)mh.brewer Wrote:(November 5, 2016 at 2:50 am)Astreja Wrote: Sounds good to Me. Okay, Mariosep, we're going to go with the Rosie_Rivets god-concept instead of yours, as we seem to have consensus here for the "gods are imaginary" hypothesis, and no consensus for your hypothesis. Well, it looks like Mariosep isn't going to start from that premise, anyway. We either accept his concept or nothing at all, it seems. 
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
