William Craig caught in a lie.

[brewer]

I think it's not so much a lie. It's just that he tries to talk about subjects he has a very poor understanding of.

I think that Craig is autistic.  Listen to his debate with Professor Millican in its entirety.  He says something to the effect (when quoting Vilenkin) about the "BGV Theorem's sweeping generality..." and Craig goes on to "conclude" that the BGV Theorem would still apply in any physical theory of gravitation, which is not what Vilenkin said.  In fact, the BGV Theorem has assumptions (as Professor Sean Carroll rightly pointed out in his debate with Craig), which, if violated, can violate the Theorem.

It is ironic to me that Craig accepts the proof of the BGV Theorem, with its physical assumptions, yet rejects the proofs of Cantor regarding infinite sets, even though the latter have no physical assumptions whatsoever!

Autistic's around the world now hate you.