sexual orientation issue

[Violet]

Actually Sae, if there was no law by harshly punishing murder, things would have been much different. I myself have some people in mind that I'd kill at first sight if I didn't fear spending lots of years in a dirty jail (which also means, losing a lot of years of my life) while having my future stained with this (i.e. employers not employing me because they have the info about me).

And you have failed politics 101.

What keeps the system in place is not the facade of "oh we'll do exactly ____ to you if you do ___"... it is that if you make a move on someone: someone else will make a move on you.

She who fires first wins...

And is then shot dead by a third party that comes rolling in.

---

The laws are some bases for the judges to play justice (or, with the interpretation of the law).

Oh sure... it's a base. An irrelevant and useless and often entirely arbitrary base that misses the point more often than it gets it. But I agree that it's a base.

I actually believe she is right. Only that there should be a lot of exceptions to that law.

Killing is what keeps anything that is both living and 'good' on this planet alive.

Or are you about to start some psychotic nonsense over not eating even plants?

Actually I guess the dead body belongs to his livings relatives. So raping the dead body harms the feelings of the family. And the only way sex with the dead body should be allowed is if all his relatives agree with it. But anyway, why would one struggle so much for a corpse, when there are a lot of living bodies around? Perhaps that's why nobody struggles to allow "sex with dead bodies" after all.

The dead body belongs to whoever can defend their claim. I sincerely doubt most families capable of defending their family member's corpses.

Why struggle? Just kill someone... and you can cut however many new holes as you want to satisfy your pleasures. Unless what you were looking for was more along the lines of a penis. In which case at least it will be somewhat 'warm' for a while after you kill them.

It's a lot of work to dig up corpses... humans put too much work into them I find. Put it with the rest of the animal waste unless you find something fascinating scientifically. And then stick whatever isn't back with the rest of the animal waste.

Yeah, but so it is running from responsibilities!

You trollin? That's one of the hardest things to do.

And I guess 'love' (the feeling of true devotion, respect, caring, etc.) between a guy and a girl, if it can exist, should not be thrown away as waste. And for some reason it appears to me that excessive sex has a detrimental effect against true "love" (i.e. the true feeling of love, with all the respect, caring, devotion, faithfulness, forgiveness, etc. it means), and therefore against a long-lasting, serious relationship. People who are living in excessive sex seem rather to be superficial (superficiality, by definition, does not allow the developing of very deep feelings) and to confound "love" with "attraction" - things which may not allow them to live a desired relationship.

'True devotion' screams NTS.

I notice that you denote it only between 'a guy and a girl'. Why not two girls? Why not 2 guys and a girl? Why not 2 guys? Why not a cat and an elderly woman? Why not a dog and her master? Why not otherwise gendered peoples? And amorphous people?

And bullshit is what I call on 'excessive sex' followed by sex being a detriment to a relationship where everyone within desires it.

Long-lasting serious relationships are usually not loving ones for the whole length of them or even at all.

This 'desired' relationship you speak of sounds only ridiculous to me. I certainly don't want it. What I want in a relationship is solely this: stability. If it does not have this... it is like any relationship with an Erratic Expansionist Klackon.