RE: Trump's Muslim immigration ban includes green card holders
January 28, 2017 at 11:15 pm
(This post was last modified: January 28, 2017 at 11:18 pm by Amarok.)
(January 28, 2017 at 10:47 pm)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote:(January 28, 2017 at 10:36 pm)Tiberius Wrote: That probably won't matter. Remember the replacement is for a conservative justice. Currently the court is actually more liberal, especially in civil rights matters (Anthony Kennedy often sides with the liberal wing in civil rights cases).Very true but it's possible that the SCOTUS would support Trump's EO rather than risk being blamed for future terrorist attacks in America. Of course there will always be such attacks but if the Court is seen as an enabler it won't go well for them. Remember, Congress can prevent judicial review if it wants to in most instances.
Article III Section 2 paragraph 2.
Nope pretty sure unlike you and trump most of the supreme court are sane
(January 28, 2017 at 10:38 pm)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote:(January 28, 2017 at 10:28 pm)Iroscato Wrote: If someone like WoG - currently serving as a test subject in an experiment to see if a human being can function with a bag of elephant semen in place of a brain - is for this ban, then I consider it my solemn duty to be as firmly against it as I possibly can be.That's a blatant personal attack. Shame on you.
Support your arguments with facts or express them as opinions but layoff the flaming personal insults. We are all supposed to be adults.
1. Yup a justified as hell
2. Yup and those can be expressed in harsh language
3. Adults insult each other
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Inuit Proverb