RE: Trump's Muslim immigration ban includes green card holders
January 29, 2017 at 4:44 pm
(This post was last modified: January 29, 2017 at 4:59 pm by Wyrd of Gawd.)
(January 29, 2017 at 2:13 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: Calls by multiple British political parties to not have Donald Trump on an official visit until he stops his illegal policy on immigration.They better be careful or else they will find themselves on the naughty list again.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-38788388
Quote:Speaking on ITV's Peston on Sunday, Mr Corbyn said: "I think we should make it very clear we are extremely upset about it, and I think it would be totally wrong for him to be coming here while that situation is going on.
"I think he has to be challenged on this. I am not happy with him coming here until that ban is lifted, quite honestly."
Liberal Democrat leader Tim Farron backed the call. He said: "Any visit by President Trump to Britain should be on hold until his disgraceful ban comes to an end.
You have gone from a country with a respected leader to a pariah state IN ONE WEEK.
(January 29, 2017 at 4:23 pm)Aegon Wrote:(January 29, 2017 at 4:13 pm)Wyrd of Gawd Wrote: What a bunch of snowflakes. No alien has any right to insist on being admitted to any country on Earth. Just because he might have been in the country he does not have an automatic right to reenter once he leaves. In the case of America the President has absolute power to decide who can enter the country and he can bar any individual or any group if he wants to and there's not a damn thing anyone can legally do about it.
If Trump had wanted to play hardball over the recent incident he would have directed the agents to put the people on the next flight to where they had just came from and no one would have any legal basis to say otherwise.
The Judge just personally vouched for the integrity of all of the people who benefitted from her decision. If anyone of them commits a crime she is personally responsible and should be thrown into Gitmo to rot.
Now in the case of the guy who sued and was released the government was probably OK with that because of his known record of involvement with the US. That satisfies the conditions of the EO. I don't know anything about the other people except if the government didn't vet them in accordance with the terms of the EO then they were admitted illegally.
You will notice that the EO is still in force until such time Trump rescinds it. Therefore its terms apply to everyone who visits the US. There will be no further court involvement in this because the courts don't have jurisdiction.
"Snowflakes"? Are you seriously calling these people - who have careers, homes, families, and lives here and have had them for years - snowflakes? Their lives have been completely and utterly uprooted, and many have nowhere to go. This isn't some college feminist you're talking about. "Snowflake"? I don't remember the last time I got truly angry at a post. Wow.
You incited this whole issue by posting fake news to support your agenda of discrediting the President of the United States of America. I have clearly and convincingly presented evidence from official sources that show that Trump's EO is completely legal, which was your question.
Maybe if you had asked if the EO was a good idea the discussion might have taken a different turn. But you didn't and now you know = Trump's EO is 100% legal and there's not a damn thing anyone can do about it except him or the next President.
