@FAF,
So let's get this straight.
You're saying a human baby doesn't have the right to use a woman's body against her will.
1) You're wrong because the baby didn't ask to be made. It was put there by a joint effort from a man and a woman.
Analogically speaking, no restaurant has a right to put their food in your mouth. Let's say you go to have dinner out and eat their food. According to you, you should be able to sue them when you no longer want their food inside you.
The problem with your argument is that you're removing any sort of accountability from two people and trying to somehow pin everything on a baby which didn't ask to be made in the first place.
2) Even if you were right it still doesn't justify the killing. It's like inviting your neighbours over and blasting a shotgun in their face for trespassing your property.
So let's get this straight.
You're saying a human baby doesn't have the right to use a woman's body against her will.
1) You're wrong because the baby didn't ask to be made. It was put there by a joint effort from a man and a woman.
Analogically speaking, no restaurant has a right to put their food in your mouth. Let's say you go to have dinner out and eat their food. According to you, you should be able to sue them when you no longer want their food inside you.
The problem with your argument is that you're removing any sort of accountability from two people and trying to somehow pin everything on a baby which didn't ask to be made in the first place.
2) Even if you were right it still doesn't justify the killing. It's like inviting your neighbours over and blasting a shotgun in their face for trespassing your property.
