Neil DeGrasse Tyson on Disproving God

[RoadRunner79]

Different answers do not indicate a different question.

Yes, they do, Road. That's what it means to be a different question.

The logic will follow if valid either way with the same premises.  You can insert equivalent variables, for the data if you like, the conclusion will still follow in the same manner.

I just did that.

You get different answers.

Because they are not the same question.

Your conclusions and explanations also seem to be inconsistent.   Going from the general (anyone) to the specific (particular someone) gives different answers to the same premise.

Because I am not asking the question that you think I am.

Take the following syllogism

Subject X is claimed to have done action Y.
Y may either be true or false.

There are a couple of conclusion one can make from this depending on if Y is true or false.    X does not exist is not one of them.

Of course it isn't.

But that isn't the question I'm asking.

How does the answer change the question?
Perhaps you should lay your argument out again if I am mis-understanding. Also, if I'm not mistaken, you reasons for your conclusion, not asking a question.