RE: Neil DeGrasse Tyson on Disproving God
March 10, 2017 at 4:42 pm
(This post was last modified: March 10, 2017 at 4:44 pm by SteveII.)
(March 10, 2017 at 4:12 pm)Nonpareil Wrote:(March 10, 2017 at 4:02 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: I'm sorry, but at best you have demonstrated that the world wasn't flooded. It doesn't follow that the hypothetical god in the claim does not exist.
To Test this.
If I claim that a Nonpareil exists that flooded the world in forty days, and we establish that the world was never flooded for forty days. I have just proven that you do not exist.
Do you agree with the conclusion, that you do not exist?
No. But, again, that is not what I am arguing.
The actual conclusion that your argument allows you to draw - and the thing that I have been saying for this entire time - is that a Nonpareil that flooded the world for forty days does not exist.
This is not complicated.
RR-what Nonpareil is doing is joining the deity AND flooding into one entity: defining it as a "Flood-causing God". And if there was no flooding, there is no "Flood-causing God".
EDIT. Sorry, i took to long to post the reply and the conversation moved on.