(March 10, 2017 at 5:06 pm)irontiger Wrote: Now you are making this ant more than it really is.
I am making the ant what it has to be for the hypothetical to have any relevance at all. If you want to claim that the ant can't think, that's all well and good, but the situation ceases to be comparable to the one that exists for humans.
(March 10, 2017 at 5:06 pm)irontiger Wrote: Regard the objective characteristics of God. If what I see and touch etc around me in this universe as part of God, then God is quantifiable.
That is a very large "if".
(March 10, 2017 at 5:06 pm)irontiger Wrote: The difference between the ant and human is that we have the cognitive skill to know God
Oh, good. So you do have evidence, then.
Let's see it.
(March 10, 2017 at 5:06 pm)irontiger Wrote: Only stupid for those who can not think past a human lifetime.
No, it remains stupid however you think about it.
Having a short, finite existence is not equivalent to having no existence, no matter how large you make your scale.
"Owl," said Rabbit shortly, "you and I have brains. The others have fluff. If there is any thinking to be done in this Forest - and when I say thinking I mean thinking - you and I must do it."
- A. A. Milne, The House at Pooh Corner
- A. A. Milne, The House at Pooh Corner