(March 10, 2017 at 5:33 pm)irontiger Wrote: What you are trying to do is make your argument legit by creating hypothetical that really does not make sense.
Erm... no, tiger. I was trying to help you to make a hypothetical that made some sort of sense. You're the one who brought up the ant scenario as a parallel to how humans might interact with God, but if the imaginary ant can't think and draw conclusions, then it isn't actually a valid comparison. You are the one who needs the ant to be sapient in order for your argument to even potentially carry any weight, not me.
(March 10, 2017 at 5:18 pm)irontiger Wrote: It is not a big If. I would have worded as follows. Everything around me that I can see, touch, etc is a part God.
You have said this. You have not actually established that it is true.
Until and unless you do, no one cares.
"Owl," said Rabbit shortly, "you and I have brains. The others have fluff. If there is any thinking to be done in this Forest - and when I say thinking I mean thinking - you and I must do it."
- A. A. Milne, The House at Pooh Corner
- A. A. Milne, The House at Pooh Corner
