"If you see no evidence for something, then that counts as evidence against it, until further evidence is presented."
Couldn't this argument work against Tyson?
Ex: "I see no evidence suggesting God does not exist, therefore, that is evidence he does exist."
Bad argument on Tyson's behalf, there are many things that have existed even though there was a lack of evidence, or the evidence wasn't obvious, and people claimed there was "no evidence".
Couldn't this argument work against Tyson?
Ex: "I see no evidence suggesting God does not exist, therefore, that is evidence he does exist."
Bad argument on Tyson's behalf, there are many things that have existed even though there was a lack of evidence, or the evidence wasn't obvious, and people claimed there was "no evidence".