(March 15, 2017 at 4:27 pm)ma5t3r0fpupp3t5 Wrote:(March 15, 2017 at 3:33 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: I would invite you to reflect on the circularity of that statement.
How is it circular? Does it follow that the claims not having been demonstrated to be true is a consequence of the NT not being evidence? Of course not, you would need to replace "NT not being evidence" with "NT has no evidence".
Because evidence has to be presented before it can be evaluated. You're not even allowing the evidence to be presented for evaluation.