Drich's point does make some sense... but it fails to account many psychological effects.
He says: here's this instruction book. If you follow the instructions, you find the evidence you want.
Of course, the evidence is not of any physical nature, or else anyone would have it, regardless of following the instructions... and that's not the point.
The instructions were laid out on purpose only for those who are willing to go the extra mile.
Nevermind that they only work on some people.... nevermind that they are very similar to hacking into your own mind...
Nevermind that those instructions seem to have been written by people who, even if not understanding the mind hack, they acted with the knowledge that it works.
How did they acquire that information?
Through ancestral observation of human mental behavior, or through an actual god guiding their hand?
He says: here's this instruction book. If you follow the instructions, you find the evidence you want.
Of course, the evidence is not of any physical nature, or else anyone would have it, regardless of following the instructions... and that's not the point.
The instructions were laid out on purpose only for those who are willing to go the extra mile.
Nevermind that they only work on some people.... nevermind that they are very similar to hacking into your own mind...
Nevermind that those instructions seem to have been written by people who, even if not understanding the mind hack, they acted with the knowledge that it works.
How did they acquire that information?
Through ancestral observation of human mental behavior, or through an actual god guiding their hand?