(March 28, 2017 at 1:23 pm)Moros Synackaon Wrote: Can we have a link to a reputable publication reporting on this, or do you think your rant-spittle is sufficient?
Seriously, I feel like I've turned the corner in San Francisco and some homeless dude launches into the middle of a rant. It's confusing and devoid of context.
That statue of the girl got put their in front of the bull a few weeks ago. It has made national news and international news.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/08/busin....html?_r=0
The artist who made the bull is trying to claim the girl statue is a cheap stunt. No, it is not. The bull is a male and especially an animal that is driven by testosterone. So if he wants to claim it is not sexist as a symbol, why would you equate humans to an animal that has the excuse of ignorance where human men don't have that excuse. He's simply pissed that times change and girls and women don't have to be subject to patriarchal icons. It is a symbol of male aggression, otherwise why not pick a gender neutral symbol?
http://nypost.com/2017/03/20/that-is-not...rl-statue/
