Our theists of all labels please answer....

[Brian37]

The need is out of purpose called "Love".

True loved searches for truly what out to be loved and sees what ought to be loved with the highest form of love.

The name of God is that connection of fabrics of love through the channels of his love.

I would elaborate, but you guys been witnessing when I became Deist to when I became inclined to be Muslim to when became Deist again, then Atheist, then Deist, then Muslim.

You are not interested in knowing why I believe, you are simply interested in dismissing my reasons and mocking it.

Thanks for your personal subjective answer. Now I will invite our Christians here to respond. One thing I don't like on any atheist website is that the different religions only talk to atheists in most threads. I want Christians and Muslims and Jews and Buddhists and Hindus all in this thread not just Christians and atheists or Muslims and atheists.

This thread is here for ANYONE of any label to respond. The point of it is to break the gridlock of tunnel vision I see from every label. I think humans get stuck on something prior to critically thinking or comparing it to a wider sample. 

Here we have a Muslim using the word "love" to point to his book and his God. Ok what makes MK right and not say CL? 

Now please MK or CL please don't respond with "that is just God speaking in different languages".

FYI you missed my parameter in the OP, I wanted your answer, I didn't want you or any believer using their book or god or club. Can you, or even CL answer without your beer goggles on?

Jesus=Love, subjective opinion.
Allah=Love, subjective opinion
Buddha=Nirvana, subjective opinion
Yahweh=Love, subjective opinion
Brahama=Love, subjective opinion

I want anyone of any label responding not to repeat what their club/writing/hero says.

Try to be brave and introspective and ask YOURSELF before you respond, WHY you feel the need to hold the position you do. Don't tell me what your club/book/hero says. I have heard all the personal subjective reasons for 16 years.

When humans have competing claims what is the best tool that is neutral to determine who got it right?