(June 30, 2017 at 1:51 pm)Astonished Wrote:(June 30, 2017 at 3:27 am)KerimF Wrote: As you said, Jesus message is surely not for all humans as it is not for other living things in the world.
As you know, even those who call themselves, for one reason or another, Christians (mainly the privileged ones) cannot, even if they want to, take seriously, speaking practically, most of what Jesus says (as written on the today's Gospel).
After all, those who have (are born with) a human living flesh only don't need, on these days, hearing any message from the Will/Power that forced them to exist in the time/space realm, we call life. They are already guided to play their various roles in life by instructions embedded in their living cells that are inherited while being evolved since millions of years and not necessarily on earth only. In other words, the continuity of life on earth and its progress is served by all living things, including most humans, the way they are instructed to do (instincts for example).
But it happens that not all humans on earth are born of flesh only. So living to serve the world, in wars (destroying) and peace (building), is not necessarily a priority to all humans. And it is natural that you, for example, are confused about the reason for which a person may live the unconditional love and care towards all others, friends and enemies. The reason, in this case, is surely not to avoid a punishment or to get a reward afterlife.
Aaaand, go fuck yourself for making an unfounded assumption about what I do or do not understand, chump. Unconditional love isn't exactly a high survival value in evolutionary terms (but then you must be an ignoramus where that's concerned, or am I making an unwarranted assumption?) but a simple altruism untainted by hippy-dippy naivete does seem to work rather well. I understand painfully well why people adopt these irrational practices and carry them out to their peril and to their horrible demises and I don't envy nor admire them and neither should you. Or are you just confused about whatever point it is you think you're trying to make?
Thank you for confirming my message... without your intention of course
By the way, if you did understand me (no matter how) you wouldn't need to address me using unfriendly expressions
I admit I made a mistake. I had to say instead: "And it is natural that a person may be confused about the reason for which another one may live the unconditional love and care towards all others, friends and enemies". Sorry for any inconvenience.
