RE: Did Charlottesvilel mean anything?
September 1, 2017 at 11:29 pm
(This post was last modified: September 1, 2017 at 11:31 pm by Brian37.)
(September 1, 2017 at 11:10 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Did those nazis claim religious freedom as their right to march around the way they did?
Anyhow, I will say that while I think it is absolutely disgusting and despicable, I still do support their right to have done it. Just as I support the right for people to have justifiably protested against their message of hate. As long as there is no violence from either side, of which I do not support in any case.
I don't especially when you show up with weapons of war. They had no intent to protect offensive speech. Their intent was to sell the idea that they are the alpha male and racial pluralism was not an option. The KKK and Neo Nazis in America is the opposite of modern pluralism.
I accept that you say you don't support them. But what they are doing is a political tactic, not a free speech defense. Their ideology is to destroy pluralism, not protect it. Their ideology isn't to protect offensive speech but to destroy pluralism.
It took the civil rights movement to break the backs of sickos like this. It took lawsuits to financially force them back under the rocks they live under. Again, if you think it is merely about free speech for them, all you have to do is look to Nazi Germany. All you have to do is to KNOW that at one point in American history, in the 1920s we had a majority congress whom were card carrying KKK members.
This isn't about merely offending for them. Just like ISIS they want to destroy dissent and be the only power.