RE: Did Charlottesvilel mean anything?
September 4, 2017 at 2:22 pm
(This post was last modified: September 4, 2017 at 2:28 pm by bennyboy.)
(September 4, 2017 at 2:12 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:(September 4, 2017 at 1:54 pm)bennyboy Wrote: Consider this: take ANY group of say 200 or 300 people or whatever. . . how many of them have done time? How many of them, if you dug up blogs or social media, have probably said truly horrific things?
Also, I don't think that sympathy is required. If a few Nazis got taken out by an angry black panther or something, how many tears would be shed here.
I stand up against any political violence, no matter the perpetrators.
Show that they committed political violence, then arrest those who committed it. Absolutely. Violence is an act of oppression AGAINST free speech, and I for sure wouldn't stand for that.
(September 4, 2017 at 1:58 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote: No, I am speaking of the dangerous, not speaking dangerously. landmark they value my ass. They value is cause the treasonous fought persons those landmark depicts killed for, not the land mark. But you seem particularly sensitive to the dangerous being spoken of as dangeous, and resorts to barely veiled leering threats. why, I wonder?
Bro, do you even English? I feel you are making a point in there somewhere, but the English is so bad that it's hard to see it.
