RE: Vaccination exemption in CA, personal down, medical up
September 25, 2017 at 8:35 pm
(This post was last modified: September 25, 2017 at 8:47 pm by Catholic_Lady.)
(September 25, 2017 at 7:08 pm)Succubus Wrote: That no one else has replied to masterpiece suggests there is something more exiting going on. Succubus ....................................................> Is off to find out.
(September 25, 2017 at 4:27 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: My reasoning is it's probably pretty rare that a kid without vaccines for legitimate medical reasons (cancer, serious immune issues, etc) would be going to school in the first place. I think many of those poor children have to resort to being taught at home due to their illness and general vulnerability. I can't imagine there would be that many of them in the same grade at the same school to where it couldn't be arranged to keep him/her in a different classroom as the other non vax kids.
(September 25, 2017 at 7:08 pm)Succubus Wrote: That no one else has replied to masterpiece suggests there is something more exiting going on. Succubus ....................................................> Is off to find out.
Nah. Same blatant troll shite from the same blatant trolls. At least they don't attempt do disguise the fact that they are trolls?
Quote:My reasoning is it's probably pretty rare that a kid without vaccines for legitimate medical reasons (cancer, serious immune issues, etc) would be going to school in the first place. I think many of those poor children have to resort to being taught at home due to their illness and general vulnerability. I can't imagine there would be that many of them in the same grade at the same school to where it couldn't be arranged to keep him/her in a different classroom as the other non vax kids.
Put the shovel down.
Um what? I'm not a troll.
Im sorry if my opinion upsets you so much. Like i said, I would plan to vax my own kids, so I don't see how this effects you.
(September 25, 2017 at 8:01 pm)Rev. Rye Wrote:(September 25, 2017 at 4:27 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: My reasoning is it's probably pretty rare that a kid without vaccines for legitimate medical reasons (cancer, serious immune issues, etc) would be going to school in the first place. I think many of those poor children have to resort to being taught at home due to their illness and general vulnerability. I can't imagine there would be that many of them in the same grade at the same school to where it couldn't be arranged to keep him/her in a different classroom as the other non vax kids.
Really, the fact is that, in most cases, separate classes for anti-vaxxed kids (as opposed to the unvaxxable kids you bring up freqently) would most likely follow two separate models, and both have serious drawbacks.
The first would be a sort of special-ed model, with a smaller group of kids that would likely have to involve hiring more teachers, and the drawback of this is that it will likely involve a very different resource allocation for schools (and that can be a very difficult task for schools).
To clarify, I dont mean to keep anti vaxxed kids in separate classes from the other kids, I mean separate classes from the "unvaxxable kids" (The ones with cancer, etc)
Someone said an unvaxxed kid is not a danger to vaxxed kids... But they are a danger to "unvaxxable kids". That's when I made the suggestion of keeping them in different classrooms from each other. Which I don't really see being a problem since most unvaxxable kids are probably too Ill to be going to regular school to begin with...
I guess there is still the issue of them using the same bathrooms and other facilities around the school though. But I'm not sure if that would be any sort of real risk.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh
