(October 4, 2017 at 4:09 am)Catholic_Lady Wrote:But I'm sure the wedding cake didn't say congratulations on your super gay wedding Steve and Ralph, It probably just said congratulations Steve and Ralph. So isn't the Baker turning away Steve and Ralph for who they are and not for something being put on their cake?(October 4, 2017 at 3:30 am)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote: In answer to C_L, I'd bake the fucking cake. I understand that if I open a business to the public, to remain viable I must cater to the whims of the public. Would I enjoy baking a cake with a swastika on it? No. Would I serve my clientele without bias? Bet your ass, just like these bigoted shit-stains should.
Equal rights for all means exactly that. If you wish to continue to be treated equally, you must treat others the same.
How would you feel, C_L, if an atheist baker refused to bake your wedding cake because you were a cathy-lick? These people are not discriminating against a cake. They're discriminating against other people.
As I've explained, refusing to bake a cake for a particular person because you don't like who they are, shouldn't be allowed. Refusing to bake a cake for an event or purpose you disagree with, should. So if I walked into a bakery and asked for a birthday cake for myself that said "happy birthday debora" and the baker happened to know I was catholic, he can't turn me away simply bc of who I am. But if I wanted a cake that said "Pro Life!" on it for a pro life fundraiser I was hosting, you can absolutely say no if you are against the pro life movement.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 5, 2025, 1:54 am
Thread Rating:
|
The Cake Case Revisited
|
 |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
The Cake Case Revisited - by Silver - October 3, 2017 at 6:09 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Bob Kelso - October 3, 2017 at 6:16 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by downbeatplumb - October 4, 2017 at 2:47 am
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Pat Mustard - October 4, 2017 at 6:33 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Bob Kelso - October 4, 2017 at 7:13 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Edwardo Piet - October 6, 2017 at 11:00 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by chimp3 - October 3, 2017 at 6:23 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Mister Agenda - October 5, 2017 at 2:30 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Catholic_Lady - October 3, 2017 at 6:26 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Minimalist - October 3, 2017 at 8:46 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Alex K - October 4, 2017 at 3:54 am
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Catholic_Lady - October 4, 2017 at 4:02 am
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by downbeatplumb - October 4, 2017 at 11:42 am
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by vorlon13 - October 3, 2017 at 6:57 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by vorlon13 - October 3, 2017 at 7:07 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Rev. Rye - October 3, 2017 at 8:30 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Silver - October 3, 2017 at 8:32 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Rev. Rye - October 3, 2017 at 8:36 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Seraphina - October 3, 2017 at 10:35 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Rev. Rye - October 3, 2017 at 11:10 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Rev. Rye - October 3, 2017 at 9:17 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Minimalist - October 3, 2017 at 9:21 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Catholic_Lady - October 3, 2017 at 9:58 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by vorlon13 - October 3, 2017 at 10:44 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by The Grand Nudger - October 3, 2017 at 11:19 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Amarok - October 3, 2017 at 11:51 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Minimalist - October 3, 2017 at 11:56 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Rev. Rye - October 4, 2017 at 12:02 am
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Minimalist - October 4, 2017 at 12:07 am
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Rev. Rye - October 4, 2017 at 12:12 am
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Minimalist - October 4, 2017 at 12:25 am
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by ignoramus - October 4, 2017 at 3:24 am
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by vorlon13 - October 4, 2017 at 2:19 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Pat Mustard - October 5, 2017 at 2:53 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Ravenshire - October 4, 2017 at 3:30 am
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Catholic_Lady - October 4, 2017 at 4:09 am
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Mr.wizard - October 4, 2017 at 7:17 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Catholic_Lady - October 4, 2017 at 9:04 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Mr.wizard - October 4, 2017 at 10:10 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by RoadRunner79 - October 5, 2017 at 6:20 am
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Ravenshire - October 4, 2017 at 11:03 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Catholic_Lady - October 4, 2017 at 11:44 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Aroura - October 5, 2017 at 2:23 am
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Catholic_Lady - October 5, 2017 at 9:23 am
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Aroura - October 5, 2017 at 10:21 am
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Catholic_Lady - October 5, 2017 at 10:29 am
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Ravenshire - October 5, 2017 at 1:47 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by ignoramus - October 4, 2017 at 4:08 am
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by The Grand Nudger - October 4, 2017 at 7:42 am
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Catholic_Lady - October 4, 2017 at 12:09 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Minimalist - October 4, 2017 at 12:31 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by The Grand Nudger - October 4, 2017 at 12:36 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by vorlon13 - October 4, 2017 at 2:16 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Minimalist - October 4, 2017 at 9:09 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Catholic_Lady - October 4, 2017 at 9:15 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Minimalist - October 4, 2017 at 9:20 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by The Grand Nudger - October 4, 2017 at 10:05 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by The Grand Nudger - October 4, 2017 at 10:28 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by vorlon13 - October 4, 2017 at 10:28 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by The Grand Nudger - October 4, 2017 at 10:31 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by The Grand Nudger - October 4, 2017 at 11:16 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by vorlon13 - October 5, 2017 at 12:38 am
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Aroura - October 5, 2017 at 9:58 am
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by RoadRunner79 - October 6, 2017 at 11:44 am
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Catholic_Lady - October 5, 2017 at 10:19 am
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Aroura - October 5, 2017 at 3:54 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Drich - October 5, 2017 at 4:28 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by The Grand Nudger - October 5, 2017 at 5:20 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Whateverist - October 6, 2017 at 11:30 am
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Divinity - October 6, 2017 at 9:31 am
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by vorlon13 - October 6, 2017 at 9:43 am
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Catholic_Lady - October 6, 2017 at 9:51 am
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Divinity - October 6, 2017 at 10:04 am
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Catholic_Lady - October 6, 2017 at 11:09 am
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Divinity - October 6, 2017 at 11:31 am
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Neo-Scholastic - October 6, 2017 at 12:43 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Aegon - October 6, 2017 at 1:31 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Crossless2.0 - October 6, 2017 at 1:33 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Aroura - October 6, 2017 at 4:26 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Catholic_Lady - October 6, 2017 at 1:16 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Divinity - October 6, 2017 at 1:41 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by vorlon13 - October 6, 2017 at 1:57 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by RoadRunner79 - October 6, 2017 at 2:05 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Catholic_Lady - October 6, 2017 at 2:09 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by dyresand - October 6, 2017 at 3:15 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Joods - October 6, 2017 at 11:32 am
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Divinity - October 6, 2017 at 11:36 am
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Ravenshire - October 6, 2017 at 12:08 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Joods - October 6, 2017 at 1:43 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Ravenshire - October 6, 2017 at 4:52 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Mr.wizard - October 6, 2017 at 6:04 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Joods - October 6, 2017 at 11:37 am
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Pat Mustard - October 6, 2017 at 5:05 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Divinity - October 6, 2017 at 11:49 am
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by The Grand Nudger - October 6, 2017 at 1:02 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Divinity - October 6, 2017 at 1:04 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by dyresand - October 6, 2017 at 1:25 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Neo-Scholastic - October 6, 2017 at 2:04 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Divinity - October 6, 2017 at 2:28 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Neo-Scholastic - October 6, 2017 at 2:43 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by vorlon13 - October 6, 2017 at 4:15 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Catholic_Lady - October 6, 2017 at 2:56 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Amarok - October 6, 2017 at 1:08 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by vorlon13 - October 6, 2017 at 2:11 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Catholic_Lady - October 6, 2017 at 2:18 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by vorlon13 - October 6, 2017 at 2:20 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Divinity - October 6, 2017 at 2:51 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by vorlon13 - October 6, 2017 at 4:16 pm
RE: The Cake Case Revisited - by Cecelia - October 6, 2017 at 10:01 pm
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
