RE: The Cake Case Revisited
October 6, 2017 at 1:57 pm
(This post was last modified: October 6, 2017 at 2:08 pm by vorlon13.)
(October 6, 2017 at 1:41 pm)Divinity Wrote: Always funny to see people use 'moral convictions' to justify discrimination.
How many of these good Christian folks deny people a wedding cake because it's their second marriage? Or third? Isn't divorce supposed to be against their moral convictions? Yet you NEVER hear these wedding cake fuckers saying they can't sell a cake to someone on their second or third wedding. As long as it's not to someone of the same sex, they're Aok with it.
Funny how that works.
Moral convictions are just an excuse. And a pretty fucking poor one at that.
You nailed it.
And that's how I know beyond a shadow of a doubt their religious beliefs are NOT sincerely held.
Otherwise those beliefs would not be held intermittently.
The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
