Ok, Now you can't disprove a negative. You can't disprove something that cannot be detected.
So when there are atheists who say there 99% certain, they are leaving that 1% gap because they acknowledge that they cannot KNOW for certain.
There sure but acknowledge that they cannot know for sure.
The flying teapot is something that cannot be disproved, As well as the Flying spaghetti monster. The point of them is to demonstrate that they have the same equal chance of being responsible for the existence of all we know just as much as god.
A god is not entirely impossible but extremely improbable.
So when there are atheists who say there 99% certain, they are leaving that 1% gap because they acknowledge that they cannot KNOW for certain.
There sure but acknowledge that they cannot know for sure.
The flying teapot is something that cannot be disproved, As well as the Flying spaghetti monster. The point of them is to demonstrate that they have the same equal chance of being responsible for the existence of all we know just as much as god.
A god is not entirely impossible but extremely improbable.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence - Carl Sagan
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
Mankind's intelligence walks hand in hand with it's stupidity.
Being an atheist says nothing about your overall intelligence, it just means you don't believe in god. Atheists can be as bright as any scientist and as stupid as any creationist.
You never really know just how stupid someone is, until you've argued with them.
