Religion and Science are 1000% Opposite

[Huggy Bear]

Well how about this, the way our cells work make abiogenesis an impossibility, but for some strange reason that doesn't debunk abiogenesis, instead scientists theorize that ancient cells must have operated differently from modern cells.

This is what you said.

It doesn't debunk abiogenesis because there's absolutely nothing to say that cells couldn't/haven't evolved with us.  And that one of the more probable explanations happens to be laid out in the video you linked.

I mean, shit, can't you keep up with what you yourself say?

Again, you miss the point buddy, I said that to make a larger point which you deliberately left out. So now we're resorting to taking quotes out of context?

Well how about this, the way our cells work make abiogenesis an impossibility, but for some strange reason that doesn't debunk abiogenesis, instead scientists theorize that ancient cells must have operated differently from modern cells.

So what makes you so sure that cells don't degrade after reproduction (In all other cases a copy of a copy of a copy would be inferior to the original), so while we may currently see ill effects caused by a low gene pool, maybe ancient species didn't due to stronger genetics.

So to SPELL IT OUT FOR YOU, if current cells are different than early ones, then why are you so sure that a low gene pool many years ago would affect a population the same as it does currently? Are we just going to assume that they remained exactly the same?