RE: For Christians (or anyone else) who deny Darwinian evolution.
October 25, 2017 at 3:00 pm
(This post was last modified: October 25, 2017 at 3:32 pm by Godscreated.)
(October 24, 2017 at 9:27 am)Jehanne Wrote:(October 23, 2017 at 10:50 pm)Godscreated Wrote: No, I do search for the truth, like my former pastor said, "if you have doubts about what I'm preaching then by all means go and check it out, then come to me so we can work out the truth.
GC
When I was an evangelical Christian and doubting my faith, I can't tell you how many people came to me and told me not to read certain books. Why can't you "work out the truth" on your own?
What books are you speaking of, I find it hard to believe a Christian would steer you away from any part of the Bible, if they did there is something wrong in that particular church.
GC
(October 24, 2017 at 2:46 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote:(October 23, 2017 at 10:50 pm)Godscreated Wrote: No, when an atheist uses proper language they will get my attention better than those that have to disguise there ignorance with bad language.
Evolution isn't test able if it were everyone would know it's true and it's not. Evolutionary science has a problem it's ignored to long, "DNA can not produce any new information," the science has buried it's head in the sand on this issue. It's time for the scientist to admit it and tell the truth to all those they've deceived....
(September 29, 2017 at 2:34 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: Proof that you can add information to DNA:
Take an organism, say we call it A. Suppose that its offspring suffers a mutation in its genome. According to creationist dogma, this must either result in no change in the amount of information, or a loss of information. Let's assume for the sake of argument that it results in a loss of information. By definition, this new organism, B, has less information than A. Now suppose that B's offspring suffers a mutation which changes its DNA back to that which it was in A. Call this organism C. Because A has more information than B, and A and C have the same information, organism C's DNA has more information than B's DNA (by transitivity). Thus, by mutation, an increase in information was observed.
QED.
You are somewhat correct, but I think you have left out part of what Creation science knows. The info in B was never lost in the sense it just left, it is no longer active, it's recessive. So when C is born and looks like A the info became active again, we can see this in dog breeding today. I've breed down unfavorable traits in dogs just to have them pop up again.
I think you know I was speaking of a complete change in a animal from one kind to something totally different, no new info can be added to DNA to cause such a change.
GC
(October 25, 2017 at 12:22 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote:(October 23, 2017 at 10:50 pm)Godscreated Wrote: No, when an atheist uses proper language they will get my attention better than those that have to disguise there ignorance with bad language.
GC
In other words, you have no answer for obvious buy-bull bullshit.
Figured as much.
I have no reason to have a conversation with an unreasonable sort like you and this will be my last reply to you until you can act like a grownup.
GC
(October 25, 2017 at 12:22 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote:(October 23, 2017 at 10:50 pm)Godscreated Wrote: No, when an atheist uses proper language they will get my attention better than those that have to disguise there ignorance with bad language.
GC
In other words, you have no answer for obvious buy-bull bullshit.
Figured as much.
I have no reason to have a conversation with an unreasonable sort like you and this will be my last reply to you until you can act like a grownup.
GC
(October 25, 2017 at 12:22 pm)The Gentleman Bastard Wrote:(October 23, 2017 at 10:50 pm)Godscreated Wrote: No, when an atheist uses proper language they will get my attention better than those that have to disguise there ignorance with bad language.
GC
In other words, you have no answer for obvious buy-bull bullshit.
Figured as much.
I have no reason to have a conversation with an unreasonable sort like you and this will be my last reply to you until you can act like a grownup.
GC
(October 25, 2017 at 1:16 pm)Astreja Wrote:(October 23, 2017 at 10:42 pm)Godscreated Wrote: This country about 100,000,000 and about 12,000,000 atheist goes to show you that we are smarter.
Argumentum ad populum fallacy. It's quite possible for large numbers of people to be utterly wrong about something, and for smaller groups to get it right.
The very existence of evolution-denying creationists does, however, strongly suggest that what is needed is better science education.
Typical atheist answer.
GC
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
