(November 20, 2017 at 1:18 pm)vulcanlogician Wrote:(November 20, 2017 at 12:29 pm)Neo-Scholastic Wrote: I guess if someone thinks proponents of traditional marriage are by definition bigots there isn't much room for discussion, is there? Shall we talk about those pro-abortion baby-killers now?
You have a point. I suppose one could be a proponent of "traditional marriage"* and not be a bigot. However, if you ARE bigoted against gays, then "pro traditional marriage" is probably a very attractive position to take.
*Not traditional in the sense that a marriage is a contract between two fathers as it has been since antiquity. Rather a very narrow 19th and 20th century version of traditional marriage in which a man and a woman freely chose one another to be life partners.
(November 20, 2017 at 12:39 pm)Divinity Wrote: Persecution to a Christian is when they can't force their religion down other people's throats.
Funny enough, they'll attack LGBT people for being upset they can't marry their partner because in Iran you get killed for being gay, and then turn around and bitch about gay people getting married and starbucks holiday cups when being Christian gets you killed in Iran.
It took me a sec to get the second point. Yes, this is hypocrisy.
First of all Chad Wooters is a bigot, and a hypocrite and a closet neo fascist. Any time he says something that seems reasonable you have to remember he's including "but this only applies to you plebs. My cheistianity means I don't need to folliw these rules" as an unsaid rider.
Second of all he's lying about christians in Iran. Being christian in Iran is as likely to get you killed as being muslim in the US, and being jewish there is far less likely to get you killed than being muslim in either Israel or Palestine.
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home
Home