Australia: Martyr complex among "no" voters

[Ravenshire]

To argue otherwise, outside the framework of natural law, is to deny any objective distinction between marriage and other types of human relationship. Of course we could have a reasonable discussion about the nuances of my position but we cannot since you've already concluded that the defense of traditional marriage is an irrational prejudice.

What natural law would that be, Chad? The one where homosexual behavior has been observed in hundreds of mammalian species, or your made up one where homosexual behavior is "unnatural?"

We could have a reasonable discussion, but that would require that you hold a reasonable position.