RE: Jesus as Lord - why is this appealing to so many?
February 9, 2018 at 10:21 am
(This post was last modified: February 9, 2018 at 10:25 am by Succubus.)
(February 9, 2018 at 10:08 am)RoadRunner79 Wrote: There is no reason or rule that states only the one making the positive claim had the burden of proof. It is on anyone making a claim. If if you claim something as false, you are still making a claim of truth
How many times does this have to be explained to you?
Quote:If someone has presented you with an idea and says that the burden of proof is on you to disprove the idea, work out what the null hypothesis is and then put their evidence for the idea against it.
The person claiming something is possible or has happened needs to produce evidence to refute the null hypothesis.
If they have considerable and well-tested evidence, the burden of proof may reasonably be considered to be on the person claiming that the evidence does not hold.
Regarding the highlight: That is where you fail.
The Null Hypothesis
It's amazing 'science' always seems to 'find' whatever it is funded for, and never the oppsite. Drich.
