RE: Jesus as Lord - why is this appealing to so many?
February 13, 2018 at 9:40 am
(This post was last modified: February 13, 2018 at 9:43 am by polymath257.)
Well, I admit that I am partial to the B theory of time. It is the closest to how physics is done (although some common treatments of the B theory have statements that are not true physically). The whole A theory of time just seems strange to me, so I am sure I don't have all the particulars correct.
But if there is an infinite past in the A theory, is it required that the whole past be traversed? Or is the statement that there is an infinite past acceptable since it is tensed?
But if there is an infinite past in the A theory, is it required that the whole past be traversed? Or is the statement that there is an infinite past acceptable since it is tensed?