RE: Doesn't PETA have something better to do?
March 12, 2018 at 3:06 pm
(This post was last modified: March 12, 2018 at 3:12 pm by Whateverist.)
(March 11, 2018 at 7:50 pm)chimp3 Wrote: I am a member of P.E.T.A. ! People for the Eating of Tasty Animals!
Obviously God intended us to eat animals. Why else make them out of bacon, steak, leg of lamb, and the rest? Duh.
I wonder what PETA's policy would be on putting dogs on the menu. Also, if we dock their ears or tails when they're young surely all such extraneous pieces along with male foreskins are good for the stew.
(March 11, 2018 at 9:20 pm)Chad32 Wrote:(March 11, 2018 at 8:11 pm)Tiberius Wrote: PETA are a bit like Greenpeace. I’m sure both organizations started out with good intentions, but the most radical members have taken over and now PETA kills thousands of animals in their shelters (which is necessary but hypocritical) and Greenpeace are anti-GMO eco-terrorists.
Why is it necessary to kill animals in the shelters? Too expensive to just neuter and raise them to old age?
In the US we don't even treat veteran that well.
(March 12, 2018 at 12:47 am)vorlon13 Wrote: and then we have crazy cat ladies with 20, 50 or even 200 cats . . . .
[shudder]
Hey, Cath-y isn't the only one.
(March 12, 2018 at 1:09 am)rskovride Wrote:(March 12, 2018 at 12:47 am)vorlon13 Wrote: and then we have crazy cat ladies with 20, 50 or even 200 cats . . . .
[shudder]
But under that amount is ok right?
I mean, you can still live with 19 cats and not be crazy right?
Asking for a friend.
The official test is to put all your cats in a giant pair of pants you wear commando style with a ball of catnip. If you survive you keep the cats and at least you will be neutered and won't produce any more hoarders.
