RE: What beliefs would we consider reasonable for a self proclaimed Christian to hold?
March 16, 2018 at 12:29 am
(This post was last modified: March 16, 2018 at 12:39 am by Amarok.)
Wow the site is garbage
Nobody ever claim junk DNA had no function nor did any geneticist toss it aside as anything. It's always been understood that junk had some function . Despite the bullshit ID advocates spew on what ENCODE found . So the Idea that this was somehow groundbreaking or in anyway makes a case for ID is nonsense .
Oh and this articles claims are deceptive and refuted
http://sandwalk.blogspot.ca/2018/02/enco...er-of.html
https://www.sciencealert.com/new-evidenc...y-junk-dna
And their are other studies which posit alternatives
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20...140234.htm
Do i also need to point out that ENCODES own scientists reject intelligent design . Oh and the none existence of junk dna would not help intelligent design . It's still an argument from personnel credulity . And just because scientist are surprised about something (they were not or should not have been ) does not support ID .
Some more thoughts on ENCODES and issues with projects reporting
http://sandwalk.blogspot.ca/2015/11/the-...ncode.html
http://sandwalk.blogspot.ca/2018/02/junk...h-dna.html
http://sandwalk.blogspot.ca/2018/02/how-...ional.html
Nobody ever claim junk DNA had no function nor did any geneticist toss it aside as anything. It's always been understood that junk had some function . Despite the bullshit ID advocates spew on what ENCODE found . So the Idea that this was somehow groundbreaking or in anyway makes a case for ID is nonsense .
Oh and this articles claims are deceptive and refuted
http://sandwalk.blogspot.ca/2018/02/enco...er-of.html
https://www.sciencealert.com/new-evidenc...y-junk-dna
And their are other studies which posit alternatives
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20...140234.htm
Do i also need to point out that ENCODES own scientists reject intelligent design . Oh and the none existence of junk dna would not help intelligent design . It's still an argument from personnel credulity . And just because scientist are surprised about something (they were not or should not have been ) does not support ID .
Quote:That's quite the picture of your attitude towards God. You and no one else have ever presented any, period. You go to the links of children with things like this picture to divert from the subject at hand.Because it not our job to prove god does not exist . Nor have i claimed he does not .
Some more thoughts on ENCODES and issues with projects reporting
http://sandwalk.blogspot.ca/2015/11/the-...ncode.html
http://sandwalk.blogspot.ca/2018/02/junk...h-dna.html
http://sandwalk.blogspot.ca/2018/02/how-...ional.html
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Inuit Proverb