RE: What beliefs would we consider reasonable for a self proclaimed Christian to hold?
March 18, 2018 at 3:49 pm
Another problem creationists have is with analogy.
DNA is analogous with a code; it is not a code, it is chemical interactions.
The ENCODE project was fascinating, trouble is, it actually demonstrates evolution, it was leapt upon a decade ago by creationists because they thought it implied something 'special' in the genome. It really doesn't though.
I can post papers from real scientists why, but I know that creationists are too dishonest to read them.
It's like GC's constant refrain that new information cannot be added in gene copying. Only true to those than don't understand the many modes of genetic transcription and copying errors or to the wilfully ignorant. Also not knowing what information means to molecular biologists.
I have been online too long to do homework for brainwashed Americans.
DNA is analogous with a code; it is not a code, it is chemical interactions.
The ENCODE project was fascinating, trouble is, it actually demonstrates evolution, it was leapt upon a decade ago by creationists because they thought it implied something 'special' in the genome. It really doesn't though.
I can post papers from real scientists why, but I know that creationists are too dishonest to read them.
It's like GC's constant refrain that new information cannot be added in gene copying. Only true to those than don't understand the many modes of genetic transcription and copying errors or to the wilfully ignorant. Also not knowing what information means to molecular biologists.
I have been online too long to do homework for brainwashed Americans.
