RE: What beliefs would we consider reasonable for a self proclaimed Christian to hold?
March 23, 2018 at 2:43 pm
(March 23, 2018 at 1:11 am)He lives Wrote:(March 22, 2018 at 9:35 pm)vulcanlogician Wrote: As I said before Heisenberg did not say that. It was from Heinz Otremba. But your article might be forgiven for citing Heisenberg. It's commonly misattributed to him...
Much snipped for focus.
Quote:...I agree with your points and your argument. However by agreeing I would like to point out that everyone should also be skeptical about abiogenesis as there is no solid evidence to it's extraordinary claims that life began from some hypothetical primordial soup that was thought to exist on the pre life earth. This sounds too much like the fictional story of Frankenstein. At least in the story of Frankenstein body parts were used to bring him to life. You may say that life on earth is evidence of abiogenesis. However life on earth can also be used as evidence of intelligent design. In fact I am very much a skeptic of abiogenesis. The chances of the biogenesis Hypothesis ever happening are 1 in 10 to the 40,000th power. It would be more likely to find a brand new F-16 on the dark side of the moon. I therefore would like to know why anyone would trust in the abiogenesis hypothesis?I don't see it as being of any more value to anyone than ID since neither one have been proven.
Aaaaand here is the reset!
Abiogenesis has not appeared once in the last eleven pages but our new troll is taking a hammering so he reintroduces it now by way of a distraction. Classic troll manoeuvre and oh so fucking obvious.
It's amazing 'science' always seems to 'find' whatever it is funded for, and never the oppsite. Drich.