RE: What beliefs would we consider reasonable for a self proclaimed Christian to hold?
March 24, 2018 at 10:18 am
(This post was last modified: March 24, 2018 at 10:36 am by He lives.)
(March 24, 2018 at 12:47 am)drfuzzy Wrote:(March 24, 2018 at 12:29 am)He lives Wrote: I am aware that very good evidence can be posted on youtube with parameters of actual evidence. I see you have no rebuttal to the video. In case you missed it here it is again:
https://youtu.be/S-hi8bMIlQ4
Nope. Peer-reviewed evidence in reputable journals only will suffice. Any yahoo can make videos to post to YouTube -- I have a cousin who made one at 7 years of age.
YouTube, Wikipedia, biased webpages and propaganda media sources will never be considered as evidence by anyone who honors scientific method.
You didn't watch the video either, that is why you don't have a viable explanation to share and no comment on who made the video.
(March 24, 2018 at 12:57 am)Jörmungandr Wrote:(March 24, 2018 at 12:03 am)He lives Wrote: Here is very good evidence of out of body NDE.
https://youtu.be/WNbdUEqDB-k
No it's not! It's evidence of clairvoyance!
Btw, Pam Reynolds was fully conscious when she had her OBE and NDE. Nothing to do with death. (Reference, HERE)
Finally someone who actually watched the video. However Pam Reynolds was not fully conscious when her spirit left her body. In fact her eyes were taped shut and she was clinically dead:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pam_Reynolds_case
(March 24, 2018 at 1:05 am)drfuzzy Wrote:(March 24, 2018 at 12:45 am)He lives Wrote: You like to pretend that you are not gullible yet you believe that abiogenesis is a viable hypothesis.
You buddy Francis Crick published his support of abiogenesis.
He believed in abiogenesis as many do. However abiogenesis is a belief, so is flat earth a belief.
(March 24, 2018 at 5:33 am)Tizheruk Wrote:Quote:You didn't even have time to watch it. You are extremely biased and closed minded.Or he's not falling for it i don't blame him these videos are shit evidence
Quote:I am aware that very good evidence can be posted on youtube with parameters of actual evidence. I see you have no rebuttal to the video. In case you missed it here it is again:and that evidence is not your video's . And there's nothing to refute
Quote:Perhaps that is because you refuse to look.Or more likely because there is nothing their
Quote:You like to pretend that you are not gullible yet you believe that abiogenesis is a viable hypothesisis.Because it is a viable theory unlike NDE bunkum . Thus one not guible for believing it. Regardless of your quote mining. And pulling bullshit statistics out of your rectum .
Abiogenesis is not a viable theory. It is made up of several hypothesis and they can not all be right.
