What beliefs would we consider reasonable for a self proclaimed Christian to hold?

[drfuzzy]

Nope.  Peer-reviewed evidence in reputable journals only will suffice.  Any yahoo can make videos to post to YouTube -- I have a cousin who made one at 7 years of age.
YouTube, Wikipedia, biased webpages and propaganda media sources will never be considered as evidence by anyone who honors scientific method.

He's a Zombie:  "You didn't watch the video either, that is why you don't have a viable explanation to share and no comment on who made the video."

OF COURSE I DIDN'T WATCH THE VIDEO.  I'm an academic.  YouTube videos are not evidence.  I follow academic standards regarding what is accepted as research.  If you submit YouTube videos as research, if you submit information from biased websites, or Wiki-anything, your project gets an automatic fail.  If you do this more than once you get thrown out of the program. 
     I gave you a very clear list of what is required to be actually accepted as proof of your claims, and you haven't presented anything yet.  Until you provide some real research, the only proper response to any of your claims is derision and pity.

Post #695:  All you have to do is provide links to 3 solid, peer-reviewed, scientific studies that prove that a soul exists, and that clearly demonstrate the soul exiting the human body (electric fields? magnetic measurements? a stable, measurable loss of mass?).  And of course, they must contain solid proof that this - exudate - clearly contains the consciousness of the newly-deceased, so - the soul has to speak for itself after physical death - somehow, enough to be recorded as audio or video.  And, obviously, this has to have been verified by 3 very different scientific teams in 3 different locations with three different subjects, recorded using multiple recording devices, with all three teams getting the same results. 

---

---

No it's not!  It's evidence of clairvoyance!

Btw, Pam Reynolds was fully conscious when she had her OBE and NDE.  Nothing to do with death.  (Reference, HERE)

---

---

Finally someone who actually watched the video. However Pam Reynolds was not fully conscious when her spirit left her body. In fact her eyes were taped shut and she was clinically dead:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pam_Reynolds_case

---

---

You buddy Francis Crick published his support of abiogenesis.

He believed in abiogenesis as many do. However abiogenesis is a belief, so is flat earth a belief.

---

---

Or he's not falling for it i don't blame him these videos are shit evidence 


and that evidence is not your video's . And there's nothing to refute 


Or more likely because there is nothing their 


 Because it is a viable theory unlike NDE bunkum . Thus one not guible for believing it. Regardless of your quote mining. And pulling bullshit statistics  out of your rectum .

---

---

Abiogenesis is not a viable theory. It is made up of several hypothesis and they can not all be right.

---

Francis Crick was an atheist and a scientist who published that abiogenesis was a viable theory in 1993.  You have shown repeatedly that you have no clue what "theory" means, but that is to be expected from an uneducated person who lives in a fantasy world.