RE: What beliefs would we consider reasonable for a self proclaimed Christian to hold?
March 24, 2018 at 3:09 pm
(This post was last modified: March 24, 2018 at 3:12 pm by drfuzzy.)
(March 24, 2018 at 2:37 pm)He lives Wrote:(March 24, 2018 at 12:39 pm)vorlon13 Wrote:
(March 24, 2018 at 12:43 pm)vulcanlogician Wrote: Now the Pam Reynolds story has lost all coherence. It was an OBE that had nothing to do with her brain death-- or it did have something to do with it??--it could have happened either way?? What exactly does her simulated brain death have to with it it, then?
So far, this isn't very convincing.
NDE skeptics do not believe that it is possible for a person to have any perception when the brain is clinically dead. However Pam was able to describe the procedure and the instruments that were used while she was clinically brain dead.
And, of course, none of it matters, even if we have fun dissecting your silly little fantasy NDE tales, your rejection of evolution, or anything else you present. There simply isn't enough proof for NDE's, just as there simply isn't enough proof that a god exists.
You cling to NDE's and your silly little book of fables to "prove" that you are RIGHT and that your god, jeebus, holy caspar, and your whole circus of imaginary friends are REAL. I hold that there are no non-corporeal entities of any stripe, and will hold that position until real proof is given. NDE's clearly do not qualify, since you (and all the people who have run real research studies on the phenomenon) are incapable of providing any conclusive results.
"The family that prays together...is brainwashing their children."- Albert Einstein