What beliefs would we consider reasonable for a self proclaimed Christian to hold?

[drfuzzy]

---

Interesting point.  I agree with the good doctor that it is insulting to suggest that belief in the conclusions of science is on par with having faith in the articles of faith subscribed to by a religion.

But I agree with Drich that faith isn't well described as any kind of claim regarding knowledge.  I personally think of faith as trust in or reliance on that which you cannot demonstrate or completely justify.  I believe we all have articles of faith in that sense.  But that doesn't mean there is nothing at all that one can demonstrate or fully justify.  Not everything is on the same epistemic footing as religious faith, but some things are.  Science just isn't one of them.

---

---

why not?

can you explain every scientific aspect in which you believe?

or is there a measure of faith involved to accept that the whole universe was condensed down to the size of a basket ball before the big bang?

Faith is faith when it comes to God/not religion. (The faith religion calls for is bunk.) God said all we need is the smallest amount and we can move mountains of doubt with what He will show/do for us.

---

---

I accept current facts and findings.  I do not "believe" in anything that cannot be measured, seen, touched, and defined.  It's that simple.  If the time should come when someone proves that a soul, or any spirit of any type exists, then I will accept that as true and change my stance.  My definition of faith comes from Peter Boghossian, I like his books.  "In truth for both science and belief in God one starts out without complete knowledge of both."  True . . . but science is generally gathering information on something that exists, and "studying" god is simply indulging in fantasy.

so big bang... evolution... black holes (as gravity wells) and a whole host of other theoretical science... you don't believe in any of it?

How are we missing such an easy point here?  Big Bang, Evolution, Black Holes, etc., -- a lot of measurable data exists for all of it.  
Theory - basic scientific definition:  A scientific theory is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment. Such fact-supported theories are not "guesses" but reliable accounts of the real world.
Theories are respectable science that is ongoing.  There is no "belief" required, just study.  
I don't need to "believe" that the Big Bang happened, and if our knowledge of it was updated tomorrow, great, but it doesn't affect my daily life.  I don't need to "believe" evolution happened, I accept the large volume of archaeological, biological, geological, migration, development, DNA, and other types of data that have been collected supporting it.
"Belief" is not necessary, we have data.   The concepts of "belief" and "faith" are not welcome in my world.