Theists: Hitchens Wager

[henryp]

2nd one 1st.  Could we talk about Tornado morality in the same way we talk about Human morality?  And the only difference is the somewhat arbitrary 'must be human' aspect?

It's not arbitrary, obviously. Humans are able to think about moral actions and think about morality... tornadoes aren't.

You really need to understand how conseuqentalism is defined if you're going to critique it.

It's always underwhelming on AF the amount of times someone criticizes a position before they even know the definition of the very think they're criticizing. It's like you're fumbling about in the dark.

Right, but you don't really believe humans 'thinking' is different than a tornado, do you?  Because we don't have free will.
I can't choose to not kick a lady down the stairs any more than a tornado can decide not to hit the local orphanage.  Was just curious how you differentiated between those two things.