(May 2, 2018 at 9:53 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: I honestly haven't really thought too much about this concept of dynamic morality I am writing about.
That morality is different person to person, there is no one size fit all, and everyone has different approaches and standards of how they develop themselves. Two complete opposite paths, both may be right for both persons with exact same circumstances but different taste they developed.
I haven't thought about. I am going to see the dialogue in Quran with this topic.
The arguments for guides, authority of God, etc, exact designation of them, consistent way, etc, still ring true, but guidance would be more individualistic and everyone would have their own path to follow by the spirit guide.
I believe at this moment Quran dealt with this. It's just that I don't know enough of both sides to make a decision.
And there is religions it seems that to believing in unseen guidance from God to him, but are more of this individualistic choosing.
I have to give them more thought.
SO CLOSE!
IT IS individual choosing. FOR EVERY RELIGION!
Do you think every Christian or Hindu or Buddhist or Jew agree always 100% all the time?
Could it be that there is no God/god/gods/deity of any kind? Could it be that humans fight over the mere projections of their own desires, even under the sub sects of the same umbrella label?
I am sure you have no problem rightfully rejecting the conflicts and claims of Protestants and Baptists and Catholics, all Christians. But, when it comes to Sunnis and Shiites somehow it is the same God but the wrong interpretation.
YES it is individual interpretation. And that is what makes EVERY religion in the world a horrible way to conduct political diplomacy. It isn't that you can force any religion out of existence, you cant. To do so would make any label a monster.
My point is that if there was a "one size fits all" and it was universal, it would seem to me no argument would occur among humans.
