(May 2, 2018 at 9:53 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: I honestly haven't really thought too much about this concept of dynamic morality I am writing about.
That morality is different person to person, there is no one size fit all, and everyone has different approaches and standards of how they develop themselves. Two complete opposite paths, both may be right for both persons with exact same circumstances but different taste they developed.
I haven't thought about. I am going to see the dialogue in Quran with this topic.
The arguments for guides, authority of God, etc, exact designation of them, consistent way, etc, still ring true, but guidance would be more individualistic and everyone would have their own path to follow by the spirit guide.
I believe at this moment Quran dealt with this. It's just that I don't know enough of both sides to make a decision.
And there is religions it seems that to believing in unseen guidance from God to him, but are more of this individualistic choosing.
I have to give them more thought.
According to the religious fairy tales you don't need a holy book for morality. When Adam and Eve ate from the tree of knowledge of good and evil humans became as smart and as knowledgeable about that issue as Yahweh/Allah. If you want to be moral know and follow the law of the land. It'll keep your ass out of trouble most of the time.
The only thing a deity can do for you is to give you eternal life if you kiss his butt. So if you want eternal life then follow all of the rules in your holy book. It'll be a good hobby but a complete waste of time because once you're dead you won't be coming back from the grave in any form.
