I'm a 7 with regard to Yahweh, Ganesh, Shiva, Odin, Osiris, Xtapolapocetl, etc because the evidence supporting then is non-existent and the evidence that they are human creations is pretty conclusive.
On the question of whether there is anything anywhere that might deserve the label "god"... I'd need an actual definition to decide. I see no reason to believe in something that can not be defined or demonstrated. Any god that wanted us to know it existed should be able to do so convincingly so that doesn't appear to be the case; a god that doesn't want us to know could hide and that is functionally equivalent to not existing since we can never know anything about it; any god that doesn't care if we know or not might still be discovered but until that happens there's no good reason to assume it is the case.
No matter how I look at it, either there is no god or there is none I can know anything about. If pressed into the pedantic "you can't be absolutely certain there is no god" then overall I'd say I'm a 6.9 but for all practical purposes I'm a 7. Bring some evidence for a god and I'll move down the scale.
On the question of whether there is anything anywhere that might deserve the label "god"... I'd need an actual definition to decide. I see no reason to believe in something that can not be defined or demonstrated. Any god that wanted us to know it existed should be able to do so convincingly so that doesn't appear to be the case; a god that doesn't want us to know could hide and that is functionally equivalent to not existing since we can never know anything about it; any god that doesn't care if we know or not might still be discovered but until that happens there's no good reason to assume it is the case.
No matter how I look at it, either there is no god or there is none I can know anything about. If pressed into the pedantic "you can't be absolutely certain there is no god" then overall I'd say I'm a 6.9 but for all practical purposes I'm a 7. Bring some evidence for a god and I'll move down the scale.