(September 27, 2011 at 3:36 am)fr0d0 Wrote: It's an assertion different to your own position, that is incorrect according to your knowledge. You are asked to consider the alternate position if you wish to confront the logic of that position. Sure, no one is saying that that is your position. It may be totally rational and irrefutable, but still it is not where your knowledge leads to the starting point.
We're not talking about personal opinions here but what constitutes proof of something.
The point I'm making is you can't use one opinion as "evidence" that another opinion is correct. It may be what you believe but you can't use beliefs as evidence.
Before you can say "A proves B" you have to first prove A.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
