RE: OK, what IS the right classification...
September 28, 2011 at 5:08 pm
(This post was last modified: September 28, 2011 at 5:09 pm by fr0d0.)
In your mind Rhythm, there is only one kind of evidence. You shouldn't presume all of your fellow atheists are so mono literal.
You as a proponent of scientism would say that, sure. A position on metaphysics no less, but I'm sure you'd fail to see the irony in that. A sweet contradiction.
I did say "if we're wanting to understand each other". I know you're not trying to understand. But that's hardly anything to do with the conversation, so why you bothered to say anything is puzzling.
I don't assume it to be true, I am stating my honest belief from the evidence presented. Unlike the evidence you deny existence of. There's no fuzzy thinking at all... I'm confronting the possibilities. Your audacity is truly astounding.
Now, maybe we can get back to the subject. If Rhythm has finished trolling.
You as a proponent of scientism would say that, sure. A position on metaphysics no less, but I'm sure you'd fail to see the irony in that. A sweet contradiction.
I did say "if we're wanting to understand each other". I know you're not trying to understand. But that's hardly anything to do with the conversation, so why you bothered to say anything is puzzling.
I don't assume it to be true, I am stating my honest belief from the evidence presented. Unlike the evidence you deny existence of. There's no fuzzy thinking at all... I'm confronting the possibilities. Your audacity is truly astounding.
Now, maybe we can get back to the subject. If Rhythm has finished trolling.
