(December 11, 2018 at 10:53 am)Drich Wrote: So you concede? are you saying were wrong in calling me a liar?
I never called you a liar. I called you a moron.
Quote:You claim luke referenced both herod the great in luke 1 and...
I showed you textural evidence.
...and historical evidence.
...and the scholarly consensus that agrees with me.
Quote:i showed you that the reference material proves luke one references not herod the great but his son.
No, your "bluebook" folks, whoever they are, never said that in any page you linked to.
Quote:Can you admit you were wrong? can you admit you wrongfully called me a liar who's reference material did not support my conclusions? Or are you a petty littl pos who will never admit a christian is right about anything? that even if you are wrong you still feel as if you are a better person?
The evidence shows I'm not wrong. Scholarly consensus agrees.
Quote:I am callout your integrity here sport what say you? will you eat your humble pie and fall on the side of intellectual honesty or will you pretend you are still right and try and troll you way out of this?!?!
You can call out whatever you like. I've shown both evidence and scholarly consensus agrees with me.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
