A bare assertion to you, an assertion strongly backed up with reason to me. Your endeavour in exploring a subject is to scrutinize it for evidence. Those of us who understand and acknowledge that evidence oblige by explaining it to you.... so it is never a case of their being no evidence, but of there being evidence that isn't understood or accepted by yourself.
As I said: reasoning that you do not have.
If you fail to understand the premise then that is hardly reason to classify it as fallacy. It is what it is: a lack of understanding of the subject.
As I said: reasoning that you do not have.
If you fail to understand the premise then that is hardly reason to classify it as fallacy. It is what it is: a lack of understanding of the subject.
