RE: Nature comes first
February 19, 2019 at 10:31 pm
(This post was last modified: February 19, 2019 at 10:32 pm by GrandizerII.)
(February 19, 2019 at 10:26 pm)PRJA93 Wrote:(February 19, 2019 at 10:22 pm)Grandizer Wrote: Or it could've always been, and with full storage of all information that could be known by such an entity. In this sense it can be a supreme intelligence without having to evolve.
There are ways to imagine a seemingly possible god without having to accept Dawkins' thinking.
Provide evidence for such a god then. Hell, define the god first, then provide evidence. If you can't, then thanks for your time.
It wasn't about evidence. Why shifting goalposts?
(February 19, 2019 at 10:29 pm)PRJA93 Wrote: And why should we take anything philosophers have to say seriously, when it comes to science?
How else did science come about?