(March 7, 2019 at 3:40 am)AtlasS33 Wrote: One of the main contradictions that make me stand oblivious is the western hand-shaking with oppressive regimes in the Middle East.
The reason always repeated for this support from the western side is that the oppressive regimes are a de-facto situation that must be interacted with if the west ever wanted to stay "social".
But Arab countries and the Middle East have been exporting immigrants like crazy to the west, and its regimes blocking the path on the rest to die slowly inside the walls of its regimes.
Isn't that a contradiction for the human-rights doctrines? secular morals and "it's good to be good" are a lie to the western foreign policy; in theory; but it's non-existent in the western foreign policy if not "manipulated to the core" when dealing with the Middle East is at the table.
Why can't the western populations realize that the more the relationships and the good treatment with the dictators of the Middle East go, the more immigrants fleeing from there would stack up drowning western countries, economical interests of west will get demolished and the hate to the west will increase more and more?
Forcing sanctions on the Arab regimes and taking their heads to trial, stop selling them weapons is the only way for peace.
Why is it that having had a major head start granted by circumstances 10 centuries ago, your allah left you in such tatters that you rant and rave and yet are resorted to effectively begging the west to bail you out?
