RE: California ban on high capacity magazines declared unconstitutional
March 30, 2019 at 8:05 am
(This post was last modified: March 30, 2019 at 8:07 am by Gawdzilla Sama.)
(March 30, 2019 at 7:02 am)onlinebiker Wrote:(March 30, 2019 at 6:44 am)zebo-the-fat Wrote: Because everyone has the right to shoot lots of people?
So we should only have single shots? Or no- shots?
Muzzle loaders. Impulsivity is a real problem with guns.
(March 30, 2019 at 7:41 am)onlinebiker Wrote:Rifled barrels were also used for hunting. Smoothbores are crap at any real distance. The Americans used their riflemen effectively during the rebellion. Didn't have enough of them. Smoothbores, on the other hand, weren't worth aiming most of the time. The command was "level", not "aim" when the troops drilled with smoothbores.(March 30, 2019 at 7:22 am)Nay_Sayer Wrote: We all know the founding fathers had AR-16's with 100 RPM clips in mind when penning the constitution.
You know what I find unconstitutional?, Dead children
The arguement of the day ( circa 1776) wasn' t for high cap mags - but if " civilians" should be allowed rifled barrels - rather than smoothbore. Rifled barrels were considered by some to be military grade weapons....
And nice touch with the emotionally charged non sequitur......Perhaps thats' s a good tactiic...
I like puppies!
( nice, huh?)