California ban on high capacity magazines declared unconstitutional

[popeyespappy]

I can't help but wonder if you even looked at the 86 page decision before making this comment.

I don't need to.  Anything that goes against the original 2nd amendment idea that you only have a right to bear arms as part of a state run, funded and trained militia shows a worrying lack of ability to interpret law.

That's what I thought. You've made up your mind so why bother to look at the contrary evidence.

There are a couple of points I'd like to make here. First is it is a district judge's job to make a decision based on applicable case law. Second is right now at this point in time in the United States the latest decided by SCOTUS applicable case law says gun ownership is an individual right not a collective one, and gun owners are allowed to have guns commonly in use in the country. Right or wrong those are decisions were made by SCOTUS, and district judges don't get to contradict them. So before you question a judges "ability to interpret and rule on law" when you don't like a decision it just might be a good idea to look at the decision first.

---

Here is a new like to the decision since the original one seems to be broken now.

https://d3uwh8jpzww49g.cloudfront.net/sh...s_-msj.pdf