RE: California ban on high capacity magazines declared unconstitutional
March 30, 2019 at 11:02 am
(This post was last modified: March 30, 2019 at 11:04 am by Brian37.)
(March 29, 2019 at 9:27 pm)popeyespappy Wrote: There was an interesting 2nd amendment ruling today.
Quote:ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DECLARING CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE § 32310 UNCONSTITUTIONAL and ENJOINING ENFORCEMENT
In short, a federal district court in California declared the state's ban on magazines with a capacity in excess of 10 rounds unconstitutional today.
http://michellawyers.com/wp-content/uplo...intiffs-MS
This is bat shit insane.
Consider the fact that western Allies after WW1 put heavy restrictions(not an all out ban) but heavy regulations on Germany as far as even civilian weapons. The lie that the NRA and GOP has sold for decades was the lie that Hitler banned civilian firearms. NO HE DID NOT! Hitler actually loosened firearm restrictions, but for party loyalists only. Hitler did ban civilian ownership if he deemed you as a rival or enemy of the state. But he expanded firearm ownership to those he saw as loyal to him.
The intent of banning high capacity clips isn't a political party agenda, it is a public safety issue. Outside serving in the military, what fucking need does anyone have with a giant banana clip or any high capacity clip? I am sorry, but people don't need those things, they want those things.
That is the problem in America, the sense of self entitlement and total lack of pragmatism.